<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ew, you got internet all over me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tjwilde.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tjwilde.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 03:28:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on My dispatches from Japan by Michael</title>
		<link>http://tjwilde.com/2010/07/01/my-dispatches-from-japan/comment-page-1/#comment-5219</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 03:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjwilde.com/?p=692#comment-5219</guid>
		<description>Hey, this is really awesome!  Don&#039;t be embarrassed, it&#039;s actually pretty funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, this is really awesome!  Don&#8217;t be embarrassed, it&#8217;s actually pretty funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My dispatches from Japan by Aeshir</title>
		<link>http://tjwilde.com/2010/07/01/my-dispatches-from-japan/comment-page-1/#comment-5177</link>
		<dc:creator>Aeshir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjwilde.com/?p=692#comment-5177</guid>
		<description>I like you. I like this. I like what you are doing here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like you. I like this. I like what you are doing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My dispatches from Japan by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://tjwilde.com/2010/07/01/my-dispatches-from-japan/comment-page-1/#comment-5143</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjwilde.com/?p=692#comment-5143</guid>
		<description>That was pretty damn funny, really random. You should see if anyone will pick up your movie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was pretty damn funny, really random. You should see if anyone will pick up your movie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My resume to TV cont. &#8211; more dumb jokes by zigs</title>
		<link>http://tjwilde.com/2010/03/05/my-resume-to-tv-more-dumb-jokes/comment-page-1/#comment-5133</link>
		<dc:creator>zigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjwilde.com/?p=645#comment-5133</guid>
		<description>Awesome :) 
Really, reaaaally laughed at the massage joke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome <img src='http://tjwilde.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Really, reaaaally laughed at the massage joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Human Web by Scott Colbert</title>
		<link>http://tjwilde.com/2010/05/27/the-human-web/comment-page-1/#comment-4883</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Colbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 03:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjwilde.com/?p=674#comment-4883</guid>
		<description>I agree with all you&#039;ve said, by and large, but I think the big determiner of what the web will be like 5 years from now will be in how people access it.  If things continue to downsize (i.e. from desktops to laptops to tablets to ereaders to cellphones), how we not only access the internet, but how we use it will change. I do see it going more app oriented; hell on my smart phone wannabe, the major sites, like Facebook, Twitter, google etc already have a button, so no need to use the browser. Personally I view that more as a dumbing down than a convenience, but really isn&#039;t that what it&#039;s all becoming? Google and Apple don&#039;t want people going past the first page of results-they want them confined to that first page where they know they&#039;ll get the hits. 

I don&#039;t deny web content is being geared towards the aggregators but you could substitute the word corporation and it would STILL be accurate. If I have any quibble, it would be that at some point the aggregators would plateau-this would be true if content and websites stopped being created-but they&#039;re not. Not by a long shot. As long as there are new sites popping up there will always be content to be combed through. 

One of the reasons i started a small press was because mainstream publishers weren&#039;t putting out the books I wanted to read. With the advent of POD technology doing that is much easier than ever. We&#039;ll never get sales like Viking or Simon &amp; Schuster, but its work we can be proud of. 

I mention that only because you touched on the &quot;David and Goliath&quot; syndrome a bit, and I see the internet fragmenting. Big corporations like google and Apple spoon feeding you the sponsored content they want you to have, and those who haven&#039;t forgotten what the internet was designed for: information, not commercialization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all you&#8217;ve said, by and large, but I think the big determiner of what the web will be like 5 years from now will be in how people access it.  If things continue to downsize (i.e. from desktops to laptops to tablets to ereaders to cellphones), how we not only access the internet, but how we use it will change. I do see it going more app oriented; hell on my smart phone wannabe, the major sites, like Facebook, Twitter, google etc already have a button, so no need to use the browser. Personally I view that more as a dumbing down than a convenience, but really isn&#8217;t that what it&#8217;s all becoming? Google and Apple don&#8217;t want people going past the first page of results-they want them confined to that first page where they know they&#8217;ll get the hits. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t deny web content is being geared towards the aggregators but you could substitute the word corporation and it would STILL be accurate. If I have any quibble, it would be that at some point the aggregators would plateau-this would be true if content and websites stopped being created-but they&#8217;re not. Not by a long shot. As long as there are new sites popping up there will always be content to be combed through. </p>
<p>One of the reasons i started a small press was because mainstream publishers weren&#8217;t putting out the books I wanted to read. With the advent of POD technology doing that is much easier than ever. We&#8217;ll never get sales like Viking or Simon &amp; Schuster, but its work we can be proud of. </p>
<p>I mention that only because you touched on the &#8220;David and Goliath&#8221; syndrome a bit, and I see the internet fragmenting. Big corporations like google and Apple spoon feeding you the sponsored content they want you to have, and those who haven&#8217;t forgotten what the internet was designed for: information, not commercialization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Human Web by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://tjwilde.com/2010/05/27/the-human-web/comment-page-1/#comment-4881</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 02:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjwilde.com/?p=674#comment-4881</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting assertion, and one that I&#039;ve also thought of - that conversation is a more natural, and is the preferred means of communicating ideas.

Nothing was actually meant by the format of this post - it was written as a personal exploration of the ideas in it, and posted because - why not? I stand by it. (Edit: I actually think it&#039;s an awful wall of text, but I was lazy and didn&#039;t create any visual illustrations or other design elements, again, it&#039;s not meant to be self-referential.)

But to address your assertion - I would not say that newspapers and magazines are struggling because we find content on the web superior. We do find the discussion superior, but I don&#039;t believe that the way we do things now will be the way we continue to do it forever, and I also don&#039;t believe it is necessarily the best way. I simply don&#039;t take that for granted.

I posted this as-is because it was my complete thought. To me, to break it into pieces would create something less than the whole. Yes, because of this, fewer people will probably take the time to consume and discuss it, but that&#039;s OK. I also post lists of stupid jokes - I&#039;m not some stuffy buffoon who believes the internet must always be Serious Business, I just think that it could be more fulfilling.  

I have stated that I don&#039;t think current models will disappear - I simply believe that new models will arise which treat information differently. They can coexist, but what I would very much not like to see is the environment swinging too far in one direction - in this case, toward ultimate aggregation and searchability, the loss of authorship and context, and the devaluation of all information and individuality.

The internet is great because I am free to post this, or anything else, and you are free to respond to it, and we are free to have a discussion about it. I am not disputing the fundamental glory of free communication. I am disputing however, that the current models are the end all, and that they exist because intellectual natural selection caused them to exist - that has certainly played a part, but so have entrepreneurs. Other entrepreneurs will create new models, and other human desires will be met in different ways, maybe with fewer trolls, less outrage, and less sensationalism.

But hey, who knows? I probably should have prefaced this post with what some might call a cop out, but with what I think is realistic: This is an analysis of what I&#039;ve seen and a few theories about where it could go. It is by no means a perfect representation of reality or a perfect prediction - ideas in their infancy, and especially predictions, can be changed entirely if just one piece is missing. But I think it&#039;s great to discuss them.

(You may also note that I take a jab at piracy, yet have posted links to mp3s here. I am not unaware of my glass house, but I&#039;m thinking about it.)  :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting assertion, and one that I&#8217;ve also thought of &#8211; that conversation is a more natural, and is the preferred means of communicating ideas.</p>
<p>Nothing was actually meant by the format of this post &#8211; it was written as a personal exploration of the ideas in it, and posted because &#8211; why not? I stand by it. (Edit: I actually think it&#8217;s an awful wall of text, but I was lazy and didn&#8217;t create any visual illustrations or other design elements, again, it&#8217;s not meant to be self-referential.)</p>
<p>But to address your assertion &#8211; I would not say that newspapers and magazines are struggling because we find content on the web superior. We do find the discussion superior, but I don&#8217;t believe that the way we do things now will be the way we continue to do it forever, and I also don&#8217;t believe it is necessarily the best way. I simply don&#8217;t take that for granted.</p>
<p>I posted this as-is because it was my complete thought. To me, to break it into pieces would create something less than the whole. Yes, because of this, fewer people will probably take the time to consume and discuss it, but that&#8217;s OK. I also post lists of stupid jokes &#8211; I&#8217;m not some stuffy buffoon who believes the internet must always be Serious Business, I just think that it could be more fulfilling.  </p>
<p>I have stated that I don&#8217;t think current models will disappear &#8211; I simply believe that new models will arise which treat information differently. They can coexist, but what I would very much not like to see is the environment swinging too far in one direction &#8211; in this case, toward ultimate aggregation and searchability, the loss of authorship and context, and the devaluation of all information and individuality.</p>
<p>The internet is great because I am free to post this, or anything else, and you are free to respond to it, and we are free to have a discussion about it. I am not disputing the fundamental glory of free communication. I am disputing however, that the current models are the end all, and that they exist because intellectual natural selection caused them to exist &#8211; that has certainly played a part, but so have entrepreneurs. Other entrepreneurs will create new models, and other human desires will be met in different ways, maybe with fewer trolls, less outrage, and less sensationalism.</p>
<p>But hey, who knows? I probably should have prefaced this post with what some might call a cop out, but with what I think is realistic: This is an analysis of what I&#8217;ve seen and a few theories about where it could go. It is by no means a perfect representation of reality or a perfect prediction &#8211; ideas in their infancy, and especially predictions, can be changed entirely if just one piece is missing. But I think it&#8217;s great to discuss them.</p>
<p>(You may also note that I take a jab at piracy, yet have posted links to mp3s here. I am not unaware of my glass house, but I&#8217;m thinking about it.)  <img src='http://tjwilde.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Human Web by Kyle</title>
		<link>http://tjwilde.com/2010/05/27/the-human-web/comment-page-1/#comment-4880</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 01:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjwilde.com/?p=674#comment-4880</guid>
		<description>This post, I assume, is an example of what you consider human-oriented content.  It&#039;s a long, in-depth essay on a subject rather than a brief statement or single piece of information.  However, I would think the ideal in human content is conversation.  Conversation is short and choppy, statement and response.  If this post were broken up into more machine-friendly bits, it would encourage more human interaction.  I, for one, balk at trying to address everything in here I could take issue with.

The basic issue is that you have some idea of what is human-oriented and what is machine-oriented, that may not be correct.  The only evidence besides personal feeling is what humans do.  What we have done is created and embraced this model of information-sharing you condemn as inhuman.  Newspapers and magazines ect are struggling because humans have found something they like better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post, I assume, is an example of what you consider human-oriented content.  It&#8217;s a long, in-depth essay on a subject rather than a brief statement or single piece of information.  However, I would think the ideal in human content is conversation.  Conversation is short and choppy, statement and response.  If this post were broken up into more machine-friendly bits, it would encourage more human interaction.  I, for one, balk at trying to address everything in here I could take issue with.</p>
<p>The basic issue is that you have some idea of what is human-oriented and what is machine-oriented, that may not be correct.  The only evidence besides personal feeling is what humans do.  What we have done is created and embraced this model of information-sharing you condemn as inhuman.  Newspapers and magazines ect are struggling because humans have found something they like better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My resume to TV cont. &#8211; more dumb jokes by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://tjwilde.com/2010/03/05/my-resume-to-tv-more-dumb-jokes/comment-page-1/#comment-4303</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjwilde.com/?p=645#comment-4303</guid>
		<description>I knows I knows, been lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knows I knows, been lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My resume to TV cont. &#8211; more dumb jokes by Michael</title>
		<link>http://tjwilde.com/2010/03/05/my-resume-to-tv-more-dumb-jokes/comment-page-1/#comment-4302</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjwilde.com/?p=645#comment-4302</guid>
		<description>moar content, we neeeed it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>moar content, we neeeed it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My resume to TV cont. &#8211; more dumb jokes by CountFenring</title>
		<link>http://tjwilde.com/2010/03/05/my-resume-to-tv-more-dumb-jokes/comment-page-1/#comment-4067</link>
		<dc:creator>CountFenring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tjwilde.com/?p=645#comment-4067</guid>
		<description>Did you hear about the soldier who got mustard gassed and pepper sprayed? He was a seasoned veteran. 

There was a big story in the news a few days ago, some guy got the left side of his body cut off, luckily he was all right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you hear about the soldier who got mustard gassed and pepper sprayed? He was a seasoned veteran. </p>
<p>There was a big story in the news a few days ago, some guy got the left side of his body cut off, luckily he was all right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
